|

photo credit:
Touchstone Pictures 2001
Notes
from AC Team:
What a year. The release of the movie Pearl Harbor over the
Memorial Day Holiday prompts a Pearl
Harbor Alert on the Web site of civil rights group Japanese
American Citizens League. Asian communities
are concerned about an increasing backlash against Asian Americans
heightened by a string of unrelated incidents that are provoking anti-Asian
sentiment. The U.S.spy plane incident in China.
Asian American Wen Ho Lee falsely accused of spying for China. How
about the sinking by a U.S. Navy submarine of a Japanese fishing vessel
near Hawaii killing those nine Japanese students and sailors? And
remember the Democratic fundraising scandals with Asian fundraisers?
To top this off, a March, 2001 survey of Americans by Chinese American
leadership group Committee
of 100 reveals that perceptions of Asian Americans have hit a
low.
Related links:
Japanese American Citizens League
AsianWeek
article by Sam Chu Lin
Committee
of 100 Survey
Pearl
Harbor: Exclusive Interview with Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa
Pearl
Harbor: Exclusive Interview with Ben Affleck
AC Team's
Solange Castro Belcher Reviews
Pearl
Harbor
After
seeing the movie, Pearl Harbor, I realize I can no
longer live in my bubble of denial. The truth must be faced. Yes,
we are living in a Republican administration.
Pearl
Harbor, Jerry Bruckheimer's latest adrenaline-pumping action-war
film reeks so strongly of military romanticism that one might suspect
he struck a deal with President Bush to resurrect the belief that
war is the ultimate test and proof of American heroism.
This
Memorial Day weekend release is drenched in lines like "there's
nothing stronger than the heart of a volunteer." Pearl Harbor
could pass for a military recruitment ad campaign. After all, Top
Gun, Bruckheimer's other famous military film glorifying the
life of pilots, came out in 1986, during the height of the Reagan
Administration. Bruckheimer hammers the parallels between these
two films; the two main characters of Pearl Harbor are also
stunt-performing military pilots and both movies feature a character
named Goose.
However,
putting aside the glorification of battle, the saccharine dialogue
and the odd casting choices (are we supposed to take Dan Akroyd
seriously as a military captain?), I hastily admit Pearl Harbor
does prove entertaining - the kind of entertainment I experience
on amusement park rides. Still, beneath my helpless attraction to
the Hollywood blockbuster adrenaline-hype, my interest in the movie
emerged from a genuine desire to understand that historical day.
As
with all historical movies, I had a hope upon venturing to the screening
that this film might reveal something about the experience of living
in this country in 1941, when America was something far different,
I imagine, from what we know today. For whatever reason, American
audiences have also awakened a desire to know and understand World
War II, and what more profound event to revisit than the moment
that began it. In this respect, without even trying, Pearl Harbor
has moments of succeeding in creating an intriguing tension between
the ostensible innocence of America, and the doomed tragedy that
lay ahead. Just as we all know that the Titanic will sink, we know
that these characters, whether we like them or not, will experience
a horror unlike any thing they've seen before.
However,
despite the swinging fun-loving portrayal of innocence that Hollywood
frequently gives pre-World War II America, the era was not exactly
America's shining moment. As many know, it was also a time of blatant
discrimination and racism against Japanese-Americans, many of whom
lost their homes and businesses while placed in internment camps.
Aware
of the potential for criticism by audiences of these not-so-heroic
aspects of American history, and oddly enough, dependent upon Japan
as a foreign market, Bruckheimer, and director, Randall Wallace
and writer, Michael Bay claim they made an effort to portray the
Japanese as humanly and humbly as possible.
While
planning the attack, Admiral Yamamoto played by Mako, confesses
that "a brilliant man would find a way to not fight the war," and
at the beginning of the attack a Japanese pilot waves to children
playing outside to go inside. However, despite these gestures of
amicability, I couldn't help but cringe at the number of references
during the second half of the movie to those "Jap suckers." Real
military pilots may have indeed uttered those words. But must we
put them in the mouths of actors who will grace poster after poster,
and remain imprinted in the minds of our children as "heroes?"
However,
the least forgivable crime of the movie remains the utter absence
of any Hawaiians in the entirety of the film. I think I saw one
Hawaiian woman for the blink of an eye in the right hand corner
of the bar scene.
Did
all native Hawaiians leave Hawaii in 1941? Actually, Asian Pacific
Americans dominated the civilian population in Hawaii in 1941, as
they do today. Instead, we are treated to droves of Caucasian women
walking in front of heavenly Hawaiian sunsets and white children
playing in lush gardens. Granted, the military base itself was most
likely predominately white, but the message remains that Hawaii
belongs to "white" America, not to it's native inhabitants.
Pearl
Harbor also manages to treat African-American men with the same
patronizing manner exhibited last summer in movies such as The
Legend of Bagger Vance and Duets. In both those films
black men played spiritual saviors to white men seeking meaning
to their entitled lives.
In
Pearl Harbor Cuba Gooding plays Doris 'Dorie' Miller, a black
man who aches to use weapons to fight but has been relegated by
the American Navy to remain a cook. Still, when his Captain (who
presumably assigned him to his duty as cook) dies in an explosion,
Dorie displays several solemn and tearful tributes to his
dead captain.
The
utter absence of anger or emotion towards the racism that affected
his life is downright bizarre, if not confusing. For reasons I'd
rather not know, Hollywood consistently exhibits a perpetual need
for approval from African-American men in the story development
of their African-American characters.
And
for my final complaint, Pearl Harbor seemed to pay the least
attention to the men who deserved the most. Besides Dorie, Bay developed
no story around the young soldiers who were on the ships, notably
the U.S.S. Arizona. We watch them swimming underneath the water
to escape bullets, or remaining trapped beneath the U.S.S. Arizona,
but we are left with little sense of their experience of Pearl
Harbor.
However,
John Schwartzman beautifully shot Hawaii's beaches and the tense
battle scenes remain, as always, exciting. At the very least, Pearl
Harbor reawakened my drive to plan my next vacation to Hawaii
and a latent interest in learning more about the history of our
country and that fateful day.
Copyright
2001 Solange Castro Belcher for AsianConnections.com

AC Team's Solange Castro Belcher moved to Hollywood to pursue a career
as a stand-up comic after graduating from Yale University with a degree
in English. Today she has turned her pursuits from comedy to film
reviewing and screenwriting. Solange is managing editor at University
of California at Los Angeles' groundbreaking Teaching to Change
LA, an online journal for teachers, students and parents in the
Los Angeles schools. In addition to her film reviews for AsianConnections.com
and AC's Hollywood Web site StudioLA.com, she is a film reviewer for
the Santa Monica Film Festival (smff.com). Email: solange@asianconnections.com
|